MY STORY
WHY
- It's Cruel. There are very few small family farms left. The meat you eat comes from factories where animals are mistreated their entire lives. Many of such livestock do not ever go outside of their cages, much less the outdoors. "Free-Range" poultry live just as poorly as those who are caged. It is used as a marketing gimmick - such animals are stuffed so closely together they have little room to move, disease spreads quickly, many die prematurely (often from starvation/dehydration), and their beaks are usually clipped because otherwise the unhappy birds would peak at themselves and their neighbors.
- It's Better for the Environment. The raising of livestock creates more greenhouse gas emissions than automobiles, planes, and ships. Livestock raised for the U.S. produce 130 times more excrement than the human population of the U.S. (think about how much waste will come from a factory of cows or pigs...). Over 90% of the Amazon rain forest that has been cleared was done for meat production.
- It Helps Reduce World Hunger. To produce one pound of meat takes an average of 15 to 20 pounds of grain. While eating grain instead of meat doesn't exactly correlate to a starving child getting more food, the lifestyle switch is certainly a step in the right direction.
- It's Better for You. Vegetarians are less likely to have heart disease, many cancers, and of being obese; they also live an average of six to ten years longer than their meat-eating counterparts.
- All the Cool People are Doing It. Albert Einstein, Leo Tolstoy, Mr. Rogers, Leonardo Da Vinci, Paul McCartney, Charles Darwin, Harriet Beecher Stowe, Pythagoras, Joan Jett, and so many more.
THE WORST MEAT EATER
In my opinion the worst meat eater are those seemingly compassionate people who "just couldn't possibly give up meat". There are some who don't care. There are some who are too lazy. The worst are those who say they know it's wrong and they really wish they could give up meat but can't. I just cannot stand to hear it said. Eating vegetarian once a week supports all the reasons for not eating meat, if you have any conviction at all then you can eat less meat. It's not an "all or nothing" kind of deal. Anyone who truly thinks that vegetarianism is beneficial can make a few sacrifices in their diet. No matter where your compassions lie (for me the environment, animal welfare, or world hunger would each be a stand alone to give up meat for good) eating vegetarian - at least once in a while - is for everyone.
WILD GAME
While I consider myself a complete and true vegetarian, I do eat wild game (by which I mean animals that were hunted). Though, I only eat something that has been shot by someone I know personally, mainly because I just don't trust anyone else. There is too much deception in marketing and this issue is too important to me to not be entirely certain of what I'm eating. So, if for all the reasons above I am a vegetarian - why eat wild game? Wild game is not treated with unnecessary cruelty. The animals live a natural life and die as any other prey does, with no additional suffering. Land clearing is not needed for wild game. Greenhouse gas and excrement production is in balance where an ecosystem is in balance; and hunting can only reduce (rather than promote) both pollution sources. By eating wild game, I eat neither grain nor grain-fed animals. In moderation, this natural meat source can be a healthy supplement to a vegetarian diet. As for all the famous veggies, I believe everyone needs to be their own person. You are wise to take into account the moral followings of others but in the end you must make your own path based on what is logical and even more importantly - what feels right. Eating game is also good for the animal population itself. I have heard people say they just couldn't eat wild meat because it just wasn't meant to be eaten - these people are the bane of my existence, well my vegetarian existence at least. They are not logical and they are making stupid excuses. Hunters were the ones who realized that the New England population of wild turkeys and white-tailed deer was too low. To maintain the sport they loved, they took steps to ensure these populations were retained at a healthy level and today both are thriving. Where hunting is banned there is overcrowding, which leads to starvation in the winter (nature's harsh population control) and increased road kill and animals straying into urban areas. These populations are actually better off because of hunting. Keeping the population level low by killing the weakest will strengthen the remaining animals and also increases the birth rate, which increases the overall population's viability. Not to mention that, if we were to truly be part of the food web - hunting and eating the wild creatures of our ecosystem is the way to do it. It's much more natural than your fresh fruit in December.